Who Enforces Daylight Saving Time

Does anyone actually enforce daylight saving time? Well, sure. If you forget to set your clock ahead in the spring and accidentally show up to work an hour late, your boss might have a few choice words about remembering daylight saving time the next time it comes around. But does any agency or entity actually have the responsibility to regulate daylight saving time across the United States? Believe it or not, yes. Its the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Uniform Time Act of 1966 and later amendments to the daylight saving time law state that the Department of Transportation is authorized and directed to foster and promote widespread and uniform adoption and observance of the same standard of time within and throughout each such standard time zone. The departments general counsel describes that authority as ensuring that jurisdictions observing daylight saving time begin and end on the same date. So what happens if a rogue state wants to, say, create its own version of daylight saving time? Not gonna happen. For any violations of the daylight saving time rules, the U.S. Code allows the secretary of transportation to apply to the district court of the United States for the district in which such violation occurs for the enforcement of this section; and such court shall have jurisdiction to enforce obedience thereto by writ of injunction or by other process, mandatory or otherwise, restraining against further violations of this section and enjoining obedience thereto. However, the transportation secretary also has the authority to grant exceptions to states whose legislatures request them. Currently, two states and four territories have received waivers to opt-out of observing Daylight Saving Time and the legislatures of several other states from Alaska to Texas to Florida have at least considered doing so. Especially in the so-called â€Å"hot weather states,† proponents of opting out of Daylight Saving Time argue that doing so helps reduce the effects of the economic and health consequences that come with longer day lengths — including increases is traffic accidents, heart attacks, workplace injuries, crime, and overall energy consumption — while improving residents’ quality of life during dark fall and winter months.   Opponents of Daylight Saving Time contend that its negative side effects were made even more damaging in 2005 when President George W. Bush signed the Energy Policy Act of 2005, part of which extended the annual duration of Daylight Saving Time by four weeks. Arizona Since 1968, most of Arizona  has not observed Daylight Saving Time. The Arizona legislature reasoned that the desert state already gets enough year-round sunshine and the reduction in temperatures during waking hours justifies opting out of DST by reducing energy costs and conserving natural resources devoted to power generation. While most of Arizona does not observe Daylight Saving Time, the 27,000 square mile Navajo Nation, which covers a large swath of the northeastern corner of the state, still â€Å"springs ahead and falls back† every year, because parts of it extend into Utah and New Mexico, which still use Daylight Saving Time. Hawaii Hawaii opted out of the Uniform Time Act in 1967. Hawaii’s proximity to the equator makes Daylight Saving Time unnecessary since the sun rises and sets on Hawaii around the same time each day. Based on the same equatorial location as Hawaii, Daylight Saving Time is not observed in the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the U.S. Virgin Islands.. Updated by Robert Longley

Should Abortion Be Legal - 1625 Words

Even though many people have negative opinions on abortions, legal abortion is a necessity women should have access to because women who do not have access to an abortion can experience more stress than if she was able to have one and many women need to have abortions for unwanted pregnancies or due to concern for the mother’s and/or baby s health. In 1972, the Roe v. Wade supreme court case legalize abortion nationwide, but since then states have passed laws to restrict the availability of abortions. In some states they now require counseling and waiting periods before you can receive an abortion. Legal abortion is a safe procedure and has less risk of complications. Many clinics, including planned parenthood, are opened around the†¦show more content†¦Without the insurance to help cover the price, which can be up to 1500 dollars, it makes it hard for these women to get them. These laws are made to make abortions safer for women, but most are making it harder to ob tain an abortion and make the women wait longer for the procedure. A few state require women to have conseling about the negative mental effects abortions can have on women even though â€Å"research consistently shows that abortion is a safe medical procedure and that the overwhelming majority of women who get abortions feel it was the right decision for them and do not experience negative psychological reactions after the fact†(Abortion). Studies have shown women who do not have access to an abortion because of laws and restrictions that may exist in their state can experience more stress than if they could have one. The extra stress could be from trying to recessive the procedure, the pressure of society’s judgement, or because of the reason they want to receive the abortion. Most women choose to have an abortion because the pregnancy interferes with work or school, they do not have the money for a baby, or because they do not want to be a single parent. Women, especially women with these reasons, who are denied an abortion exper ience more anxiety, lower self-esteem, and less life satisfaction. There is no studies that prove there are negative mental and emotional side effect from getting anShow MoreRelatedAbortion Should Not Be Legal1647 Words   |  7 PagesOne of the most highly debated topics is abortion and whether or not it should be legal. People who oppose abortion, meaning they are pro-life claim that abortion should be completely illegal with no aspects of it whatsoever; it can be a murder for the people standing against it. The other side of the argument, meaning people who are pro-choice, defend it by believing it to be a right been given to the women. They also claim even if abortion was to be illegal, it would still be practiced. EveryRead MoreAbortion Should Not Be Legal920 Words   |  4 Pagesworld has struggled with for ages and one thing that people are advocating around the world for is abortion. Abortion is either a procedure or pill that stops a fetus s heart. Abortion should not be legal because life beings at creation, abortions are a direct violation of the 14th amendment, and thousands of people would love to adopt a child: handicapped or otherwise. Abortion should not be legal because life begins at creation. What is creation? Some people say conception, but it actually isRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal?1320 Words   |  6 PagesAbortion, as you all may know, is a really popular topic. There have long been many debates between the two groups, pro-life and pro-choice. People who are pro-life believe that part of the government’s job is to protect all forms of human life. Those who are pro-choice believe that every individual should have control over their own reproductive systems. Pro-life supporters strongly believe that even an undeveloped fetus has life; it is still growing and it needs to be protected. And this soundsRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal?1217 Words   |  5 PagesNovember 2015 Should Abortion be Legal Among all the issues that have been fought for or against in the United States, abortion may be one of the most popular issues that Americans are passionate about. Abortion is defined as the removal of the embryo or fetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy. Thousands of abortions take place every single day, and yet public opinion remains at a standstill as to whether or not abortion is ethical. Everyone holds different opinions on abortion. The proponentsRead MoreAbortion Should Not Be Legal Essay1596 Words   |  7 Pages Abortions have been performed on women for thousands of years. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy. Most often it is performed during the first 20 weeks of being pregnant. The controversy over whether or not abortion should be legal continues to divide Americans till this day. An important landmark case was the Roe v. Wade case, where the Court argued that the zone of privacy was broad enough to encompass a woman s decision whether or not to terminateRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal? Essay1089 Words   |  5 PagesWhen the word abortion is heard, it is always associated with many negative things such as murder and inhumanity. However not legalizing abortion creates a huge problem for women around the world. Having a child takes consideration, planning and preparation and if pregnancy happens without any of this, why bother to have it at all? The reasons why abortion should be legal is that it supports the fundamental human rights for women by giving them a choice, it reduces crime by reducing the number ofRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal?1135 Words   |  5 PagesKelsi Hodgkin Composition 1 Professor Chipps 19 October 2015 Should Abortion Be Legal A common debate in the world today involves abortion, the deliberate end of human pregnancy, and whether or not it should be legalized. â€Å"Every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day† (â€Å"Abortions Worldwide this Year†). On one side of the argument, people are not disturbed by this grotesque number, and on theRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal?963 Words   |  4 PagesLegal or Illegal? Which would you prefer? Not many are willing to discuss such a gut wrenching topic, but this needs to be addressed. It is a very controversial topic with having to do with women rights and activists. Since there are two sides to every argument, there is one side such as to make abortion legal and the opposing side to keep abortions illegal. In my opinion making abortion illegal can regulate the amount of women who do get pregnant. I believe that making abortions legal will let womenRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal?867 Words   |  4 PagesABORTION Abortion is a deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. There are series of legal, moral and ethical issues which may arise about abortion. Most arguments about abortion are often focused on political insinuations and the legal aspect of such actions. Some frequently asked questions’ regarding the issue is if the practice should be outlawed and regarded as murder or should women have the right to practice it. For example, prior toRead MoreShould Abortions Be Legal?939 Words   |  4 PagesShould abortions be legal? Abortions have been a big issue since the Roe v Wade case. There have been a lot of disagreements between the Pro-life supporters and the pro-choice supporters. Pro-life supporters feel like abortions deter murder, while pro-choice supporters believe that the women should be able to make their own decisions. I am a part of the pro-life supporters because I feel like abortions are wrong for several of reasons. Why should women get an abortion if there are other choices for

Who are the real winners and losers in RJR Nabisco takeover Free Essays

Most Of us looks at LOBO transactions from outs idà ©e and have completely different viewpoint how these transactions are done. Barbarians at the Gate presents a n insider’s perspective. We somehow have these believe that when there is billions of dollars involved in transactions, Coo’s, investors, investment bankers make their decisions based on numbers, trying g to be objective to make rational decisions and very seldom let their subjectivity such as their ego to drive thee r decisions. We will write a custom essay sample on Who are the real winners and losers in RJR Nabisco takeover or any similar topic only for you Order Now However after reading the book, I realize how wrong we all are. This paper focuses on what the management team did wrong that cause them to fail and who are the real winners from this transaction. Why management team lost When Ross Johnson proposed a levered buyout, he was sure he would win. H e thought that Or’s directors would give him the deference due a chief executive, never realizing that the b road would have no choice legally or morally but to treat him as an outsider. The following factors highlights why management team lost. Remaining Equity: The board tried to keep the company as unbroken as poss. able to minimize the negative effect on employees. However the management team planned to keep only t e tobacco business and sell the entire food business after the acquisition. Employees’ benefits: Management focused only on employees who would sat y and did not care about employees who would lose their jobs. Ross Johnson did a mistake during one of his interviews regarding potential layoff in the Atlanta headquarters by saying â€Å"those workers had port able jobs and could find employment elsewhere†. Loosing boards trust: Even though Johnson insisted that some portion in queue TTY would be divided among workers, only six names emerged besides his own. Too much for too few, this s what the directors thought, which shocked them. In the end, Ross Johnson lost the battle when he refuse d to guarantee the benefits of those same workers. Choice of bankers and lack of clarity. Choosing only one banker whom Ross Joe hone’s friend suggested was a big mistake. Ross Johnson did not have a clear overall approach and was cons sisterly following Shearers Salmon’s advises. Why KIRK won Clear strategy: Recruit every significant player so that the other bidding group s would not be able to retain them and left the management-Shearers bidding group with only one available e player, Salomon Brothers, with significant access to capital market. Reading board’s mind: Keeping its options open, KIRK did not disclose fully its Eng-term plans and tried consistently read the board’s mind and to act based on it (for example, guar noted severance and other benefits for employees who would lose their jobs, or the announcement to Pl an to hire Paul Stitch as the chairman and CEO in order to mitigate the uncertainties regarding the business as, since he has been with company previously and showed due diligences in his position). Who are the real winner and losers? How to cite Who are the real winners and losers in RJR Nabisco takeover, Papers